Does the 200 EMA bounce (trend + pullback) strategy work?

We coded the 200 ema bounce (trend + pullback) to exact mechanical rules and ran it on june 1, 2025 – june 1, 2026 (12 months) of real data with fees on. No discretion, losers published as losers. Here is the verified result.

Secuora Verification

Verified Result

31/ 100
Weak / Unverified

Weak: the mechanical version barely cleared, or failed to clear, the fee hurdle.

Markets tested
4
Markets profitable
0 / 4
Total trades
664
Win rate
34.2%
Profit factor
0.70
Avg net P&L
-32.8%
Avg max drawdown
38.5%
Best market
ETH -14.7%
MarketTFTradesWinPFMax DDNet
ETH1h18833.5%0.8730.8%-14.7%
Gold (PAXG)1h12635.7%0.7721.6%-20.3%
BTC1h17529.7%0.6937.7%-34.6%
EUR (EURUSDT)1h17538.3%0.5063.8%-61.6%
How the SVS 31 breaks down ▾
Edge (profit factor)
4 / 35
Robustness (markets)
0 / 20
Sample size
18.8 / 20
Drawdown control
5.4 / 15
Consistency
2.9 / 10

12 months of real 1-minute data, fees on (0.05%/side), $10k start, 1% risk. How the score works →

The exact rules tested

  • In the direction of the 200 EMA, enter when price pulls back and touches the 200 EMA; 1.5x ATR stop; 2R target

How to read this

This is the mechanical floor — what the rules alone produced after costs, with zero discretion. A low score doesn’t mean the idea is worthless; it’s the baseline your filtering and judgement have to beat. The SVS methodology explains exactly how the score is built.

Test your own version of this

Add a trend filter, a session window, or a confluence and see if you can beat the floor. Describe it in plain English and the AI backtester runs it on real data.

Open the AI backtester →

Questions

Is the 200 EMA bounce (trend + pullback) strategy profitable?

Weak: the mechanical version barely cleared, or failed to clear, the fee hurdle. Across 4 markets and 664 trades with fees on, it had a profit factor of 0.70 and an average net return of -32.8%.

What is the win rate of the 200 EMA bounce (trend + pullback) strategy?

34.2% across all tested markets. Note that win rate alone is misleading — with a fixed reward-to-risk target, a mechanically negative strategy can still win 30–45% of the time.

How was the 200 EMA bounce (trend + pullback) strategy tested?

Coded to exact mechanical rules and run on June 1, 2025 – June 1, 2026 (12 months) of real 1-minute data, fees on (0.05% per side), $10,000 start, 1% risk per trade, on Secuora's deterministic engine. No discretion.

More Trend / Momentum strategies, verified