ICT / Smart Money · Original research · June 1, 2025 – June 1, 2026 (12 months)

ICT Silver Bullet: backtest results on 12 months of real data

The "Silver Bullet" is one of the most-searched ICT (Inner Circle Trader) setups: during a fixed one-hour window — 10:00 to 11:00 New York time — wait for a liquidity sweep, a market-structure shift in the opposite direction, then enter on the retrace into the fair value gap that move created.

Almost everything written about it is anecdote. We ran it as a machine would: exact mechanical definitions, 12 months of real 1-minute Binance data on BTC and ETH, realistic costs, 1% risk per trade — using the same deterministic engine that powers Secuora’s AI backtester. Here is what actually happened, including a finding most articles won’t give you.

Secuora Verification

Verified Result

20/ 100
No Edge

No edge: net negative after costs across 2 markets.

Markets tested
2
Markets profitable
0 / 2
Total trades
93
Win rate
12.9%
Profit factor
0.11
Avg net P&L
-37.7%
Avg max drawdown
38.2%
Best market
BTC -33.5%
MarketTFTradesWinPFMax DDNet
BTC5m4617.4%0.1433.5%-33.5%
ETH5m478.5%0.0842.8%-41.8%
How the SVS 20 breaks down ▾
Edge (profit factor)
0 / 35
Robustness (markets)
0 / 20
Sample size
13.2 / 20
Drawdown control
5.5 / 15
Consistency
0.9 / 10

12 months of real 1-minute data, fees on (0.05%/side), $10k start, 1% risk. How the score works →

The exact rules we tested

  1. Trade only between 10:00 and 11:00 New York time (DST-correct).
  2. Condition 1 — liquidity sweep: a wick takes out a prior swing high/low (fractal lookback 3) and the candle closes back inside.
  3. Condition 2 — market-structure shift: a close beyond the most recent confirmed opposing swing.
  4. Condition 3 — FVG retrace: price returns to the 50% level (consequent encroachment) of the freshest unfilled 3-candle fair value gap, max 30 bars old.
  5. Entry at the close of the qualifying 5-minute candle; stop beyond the last opposing swing; target 2R; any open trade closes when the window ends.
  6. Risk: 1% of equity per trade; costs: 0.05% commission per side; position size capped at 10× notional leverage.

Results

Binance spot 1-minute klines (data-api.binance.vision), aggregated per strategy timeframe · starting balance $10,000 · risk 1%/trade · Commission 0.05% per side; no spread/slippage modeled (BTC/ETH spot spreads are sub-basis-point); position size capped at 10× notional leverage. Generated 2026-06-12 by the Secuora ai-strategy deterministic runner (same engine as the in-app AI backtester).

ICT Silver Bullet (AM)
BTCUSDT
5m candles · 105,120 bars
Trades
1
Win rate
0.0%
Profit factor
0.00
Net P&L
-1.2%
Expectancy / trade
−$120
Avg R multiple
-1.20
Max drawdown
-1.2%
Fees paid
$20
ETHUSDT
5m candles · 105,120 bars
Trades
1
Win rate
0.0%
Profit factor
0.00
Net P&L
-1.8%
Expectancy / trade
−$176
Avg R multiple
-2.31
Max drawdown
-1.8%
Fees paid
$100
ICT Silver Bullet (relaxed: sweep + FVG, no same-candle MSS)
BTCUSDT
5m candles · 105,120 bars
Trades
46
Win rate
17.4%
Profit factor
0.14
Net P&L
-33.5%
Expectancy / trade
−$73
Avg R multiple
-7.51
Max drawdown
-33.5%
Fees paid
$3,323
MonthTradesWin rateNet P&L
2025-0620%−$262
2025-0750%−$535
2025-08119%−$939
2025-0920%−$166
2025-1040%−$459
2025-1130%−$271
2026-01333%−$148
2026-03367%$96
2026-04714%−$499
2026-05650%−$169
ETHUSDT
5m candles · 105,120 bars
Trades
47
Win rate
8.5%
Profit factor
0.08
Net P&L
-41.8%
Expectancy / trade
−$89
Avg R multiple
-8.55
Max drawdown
-42.8%
Fees paid
$3,017
MonthTradesWin rateNet P&L
2025-061100%$167
2025-0720%−$257
2025-0830%−$399
2025-0930%−$450
2025-10714%−$509
2025-1150%−$552
2025-1220%−$224
2026-01119%−$988
2026-0210%−$118
2026-03425%−$220
2026-0470%−$549
2026-0510%−$84

Assumptions (how loose terms were pinned down)

  • FVG = 3-candle imbalance; entry at the 50% (consequent encroachment) of the freshest unfilled gap
  • MSS = close beyond the most recent confirmed swing (fractal lookback 3)
  • Sweep = wick through the prior swing with a close back inside
  • Risk 1% of equity per trade
  • RELAXED reading: liquidity sweep and FVG retrace must coincide on the same 5m candle; the strict recipe additionally requires a same-candle market-structure shift
  • Published alongside the strict reading so the sample-size difference is visible

The honest finding: the strict confluence almost never lines up

Read mechanically — all three conditions true on the same 5-minute candle — the Silver Bullet barely ever fires. Across 12 months and two instruments the strict reading produced almost no qualifying candles inside the window. That is not a bug; it is a property of the definition. Discretionary traders sequence these conditions over several candles and exercise judgment about which swing "counts" — which means two traders can call completely different trades "the Silver Bullet".

So we also tested a relaxed reading (sweep + FVG retrace coinciding, dropping the same-candle structure-shift requirement) to get a tradeable sample. Both result sets are below, labeled. When someone quotes you a Silver Bullet win rate, the first question to ask is: which mechanical reading did they test?

How to read these numbers

These are mechanical results on crypto (BTC/ETH trade 24/7, so the NY window captures US-equities-open volatility rather than an exchange open). They are not a verdict on how any individual trades the setup discretionarily — they are a floor: what the rules alone, without judgment, would have produced after costs.

Methodology, in one paragraph

Data: Binance spot 1-minute klines (data-api.binance.vision), aggregated per strategy timeframe, June 1, 2025 – June 1, 2026 (12 months). Execution: Secuora’s deterministic strategy runner (the same engine behind the in-app AI backtester) — single position at a time, entries at the close of the signal candle, commission 0.05% per side; no spread/slippage modeled (btc/eth spot spreads are sub-basis-point); position size capped at 10× notional leverage, starting balance $10,000, 1% risk per trade. Swings are confirmed fractals with no look-ahead. These are mechanical results: no discretion, every signal taken. Past performance does not predict future results; this is research, not financial advice.

Frequently asked questions

What is the ICT Silver Bullet strategy?

A time-window setup popularized by Inner Circle Trader: during 10:00–11:00 New York time (there are also 3–4am and 2–3pm variants), wait for a liquidity sweep, then a market-structure shift, then enter on the retrace into the fair value gap left by that move, targeting roughly 2R.

What win rate does the Silver Bullet have?

It depends entirely on the mechanical reading. In our 12-month BTC/ETH test, the strict same-candle reading produced too few trades to quote a meaningful win rate, and the relaxed sweep+FVG reading produced the win rate shown in the results table on this page. Treat any quoted Silver Bullet win rate without a published rule set as marketing.

Does the Silver Bullet work on crypto?

The 10–11am New York window still corresponds to a real volatility regime on BTC and ETH (the US equities open). Our mechanical test after costs is published above — and you can replay the same window candle-by-candle on Secuora to build your own sample.

How can I backtest the Silver Bullet myself?

Two ways on Secuora: describe it in plain English to the AI backtester (it compiles your words into the same deterministic engine used for this research), or replay the 10–11am window bar by bar in the replay terminal and trade it manually with simulated orders.

Run your own version of this test

Change the window, the stop, the target, the instrument — describe it in plain English and Secuora’s AI backtester runs it through the same engine that produced these numbers. Or replay the chart bar by bar and trade it yourself.

More strategy research

ICT / Smart Money
Fair Value Gap strategy: 12-month backtest stats
Breakout
Opening Range Breakout: 12-month backtest, win rate and stats
ICT / Smart Money
Liquidity sweep reversal: 12-month backtest results
Trend / Momentum
EMA 50/200 golden cross: what it does intraday (real results)
Sessions
London session breakout: 12-month backtest results
Sessions
Trading the New York open: two mechanical readings, 12 months of data
Sessions
NY opening drive: 12-month backtest results
Sessions
Power hour (15:00–16:00 NY): 12-month backtest results
ICT / Smart Money
Turtle Soup: backtest results for the intraday failed-breakout fade
ICT / Smart Money
Golden pocket: the 0.618–0.65 zone, pinned to testable rules
Price Action
Supply and demand zones: exact rules and the backtest plan
Price Action
Break and retest: exact rules and the backtest plan
Indicators
MACD cross: 12-month backtest results (zero-line vs signal-line)
Indicators
RSI divergence strategy: exact rules and the backtest plan
Candlestick Patterns
Inside bar breakout: exact rules and the backtest plan
Candlestick Patterns
Engulfing candle strategy: exact rules and the backtest plan
Mean Reversion
Mean reversion with RSI: 12-month backtest results on real data
Scalping
Momentum scalping on 1-minute charts: what fees actually do
Indicators
VWAP bounce: the rules, the anchor problem, and the backtest plan
Breakout
Donchian 20-bar channel breakout: 12-month backtest on real data
Indicators
Stochastic %K/%D cross in oversold/overbought zones: 12-month backtest
Trend / Momentum
VWAP cross trend on 5-minute charts: what 24/7 markets do to it
Breakout
Previous-day high/low break: the closest-to-breakeven result in our research
Mean Reversion
Fading the stretch: 3% from the 50 SMA, mean reversion backtest
Trend / Momentum
Rate-of-change momentum: trading the 24-bar surge, 12-month backtest
Breakout
Bollinger squeeze breakout: trading the volatility expansion, 12-month test
Trend / Momentum
HTF trend filter + 20 EMA pullback: 12-month backtest on real data